{"id":185,"date":"2025-05-20T01:43:58","date_gmt":"2025-05-19T21:43:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.actutech.app\/the-best-garmin-watches-for-training-and-everyday-life\/"},"modified":"2025-05-20T01:43:58","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T21:43:58","slug":"the-best-garmin-watches-for-training-and-everyday-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.actutech.app\/en\/the-best-garmin-watches-for-training-and-everyday-life\/","title":{"rendered":"The best Garmin watches for training and everyday life"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"\"

Garmins aren\u2019t just multisport behemoths anymore. | Illustration by Will Joel \/ The Verge<\/figcaption><\/p><\/figure>\n

Few brands are as synonymous with outdoor sports as Garmin. You\u2019ll find these fitness trackers and smartwatches on dozens of wrists at any 5K, marathon, or Ironman. You\u2019ll also find Garmin devotees among divers, thru-hikers, golfers, kiteboarders \u2014 you name it. But these devices aren\u2019t just<\/em> for athletes. The company\u2019s made significant strides in its lifestyle offerings, so regardless of your fitness level, there\u2019s a Garmin for everyone.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re coming from a more traditional smartwatch, Garmin\u2019s core strengths lie in fitness, GPS, adventuring, and durability. These are hardy devices that are meant to withstand the elements and last weeks<\/em> on a single charge. Several models come with offline maps, advanced navigational features, and more training metrics than any other platform. Garmin devices tend to be on the pricier side, however, and the company recently announced<\/a> it would begin putting its newest features behind a paywall. That\u2019s a bummer given Garmin spent years\u00a0publicly stating it had no intention of charging its users extra.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

How we test Garmin watches<\/p>\n

There are fitness trackers and smartwatches, and then there are Garmins. Depending on the type of Garmin \u2014 there are\u00a0many\u00a0<\/em>\u2014 we will tailor our benchmarks and experiential, real-life testing. If it\u2019s a rugged Fenix model, we\u2019ll go on extensive GPS activities, see how well it works as a navigation tool, and dive deep into training metrics. If it\u2019s more lifestyle focused, like the Venu 3, we\u2019ll put an added focus on how well smart features like voice assistant access, notifications, and style. Because people buy Garmins to last a long time, we also put special consideration on battery life testing. Some other factors we consider are durability, performance, ability to connect to gym equipment, and GPS accuracy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Battery life<\/p>\n

Garmins are known for extra long battery life. The question is, does it last days, weeks, or even a month?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Training metrics <\/p>\n

Garmin has so many training features that even the pros probably don\u2019t use all of them. Do you get coaching programs and stamina graphs? Or are you sticking to the basics like steps, pace, and mileage?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Navigational features <\/p>\n

Same goes for navigational features. While Garmin is known for its GPS tech, there are multiple kinds of GPS tracking and satellite systems. We also look at whether these navigational features fit the use case. For example, do running watches have back-to-start<\/a>? Do offline maps come preloaded for thru-hikers?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Style and durability<\/p>\n

Do these watches hold up to intense activity? Are they discreet enough to wear to formal occasions without screaming \u201cI love exercise!!!!!\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Value<\/p>\n

Garmins are expensive. Does the price make sense for the intended user, feature set, and build quality?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Garmins aren\u2019t too shabby on smarts, either. While more fitness-focused than anything from Apple, Google, or Samsung, there\u2019s enough to get you the basics like notifications and then some. For example, most Garmins have fall detection and safety features, and several of the latest Garmins<\/a> recently got an FDA-cleared EKG feature<\/a>. (You\u2019ll need a phone on hand, however, as only one Garmin model has cellular connectivity.) Many Garmin devices also support offline music playback and come with a small third-party app ecosystem.<\/p>\n

There are a lot <\/em>of Garmin watches to choose from. No, seriously, there are six major lineups, and each has a multitude of models. But no worries \u2014 I test several Garmins every year and can help point you in the right direction.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/h2>\n
\n
    \n
  1. The best Garmin for runners<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. The best Garmin for endurance sports<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. The best Garmin on a budget<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. The best Garmin to replace a Fitbit<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. The best Garmin smartwatch<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. What\u2019s coming next<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    The best Garmin for runners<\/h2>\n

    <\/em>Sizes:<\/strong> 42mm w\/ 18mm straps; 46mm w\/ 22mm straps \/ Weight:<\/strong> 39g (42mm); 47g (46mm) \/ Battery life:<\/strong> Up to 15 days (42mm); 13 days (46mm) in smartwatch mode \/ Display type:<\/strong> OLED touchscreen \/ GPS:<\/strong> All-systems GNSS and dual-frequency GPS \/ Connectivity:<\/strong> Bluetooth, Ant Plus, Wi-Fi \/ Water resistance:<\/strong> 5ATM \/ Music storage:<\/strong> 8GB<\/em><\/p>\n

    Garmin has many <\/em>running watches, and a lot of them are great. But the Forerunner 265 or 265S (if you have petite wrists) strikes an excellent balance between price, feature set, battery life, and a vibrant OLED display.<\/p>\n

    That said, the Forerunner 265 \/ 265S is a bit of an odd duck. It comes a mere nine months after its predecessor, the Forerunner 255<\/a>, and is, in many ways, pretty much the same watch. The main difference is the 265 has an OLED display compared to the 255\u2019s memory-in-pixel screen. Usually, that means worse battery life, but in this case, we got about a week on a single charge with the always-on display enabled. Without it, you can get up to 15 days. Given that OLED is easier to read and just, well, looks nicer, that gives the 265 lineup an edge over the 255.<\/p>\n

    \"Close-up<\/p>\n

    The 265 also has dual-frequency GPS (also known as multi-band). The gist is you get much more accurate maps in challenging environments like cities and dense forests because you can access both the L1 and L5 satellite frequencies. And even with dual-frequency GPS enabled, you still don\u2019t lose a whole lot of battery life. I wore it during a half marathon with that and the AOD enabled, and I still had over 80 percent battery by the time I got home. This is also an excellent price, as the majority of multi-band GPS watches cost well over $600.<\/p>\n

    My main complaint is that $450, while not bad for Garmin, is still a lot when you consider that\u2019s the same price as smarter smartwatches with great running features. Some runners won\u2019t care. But if you\u2019re on a budget \u2014 or you\u2019re new to running and feel iffy about spending that much \u2014 then consider the Forerunner 165<\/a> series. It starts at $250 (add another $50 for onboard music) and does almost everything the 265 series does. The main things you\u2019re missing are dual-frequency GPS and a few more niche sport profiles. But if you\u2019re mostly sticking to running, gym equipment, cycling, swimming, and hiking, you\u2019re covered.<\/p>\n

    Neither has all of <\/strong>Garmin\u2019s training features, but it\u2019s got what you\u2019ll need to run anything from a 5K to a full marathon. That includes a Race Predictor, which gives you an estimate of what your best time would be based on your actual training. You can also use PacePro to figure out your pacing strategy for a race. You also get Garmin\u2019s Training Readiness feature to help gauge load and recovery, Garmin Coach plans, and a host of running form metrics. It also supports offline music and safety features like fall detection. The only thing they lack is advanced mapping. (They still have trackback, point-to-point navigation, and real-time breadcrumb trail support, however.)<\/p>\n

    Read my full Garmin Forerunner 265S review<\/a>.<\/h5>\n

    The best Garmin for endurance sports<\/h2>\n

    <\/em>Sizes:<\/strong> 42mm w\/ 20mm straps; 47mm w\/ 22mm straps; 51mm w\/ 26mm straps \/ Weight:<\/strong> 42mm: 63g stainless steel, 58g titanium; 47mm: 78g stainless steel, 70g titanium; 51mm: 98g stainless steel, 88g titanium \/ Battery life: <\/strong>42mm: up to 10 days (4 with AOD); 47mm: up to 16 days (6 with AOD); 51mm: up to 31 days (11 with AOD) \/ Display type:<\/strong> OLED \/ GPS:<\/strong> All-systems GNSS and dual-frequency GPS \/ Connectivity:<\/strong> Bluetooth, Ant Plus, Wi-Fi \/ Water resistance:<\/strong> 10ATM \/ Music storage:<\/strong> Up to 32GB<\/em><\/p>\n

    The Epix Pro<\/a> will get you every fitness feature that Garmin has to offer. And I mean everything<\/em>. It would frankly be easier to tell you what the Epix Pro does not have: things that are limited to LTE smartwatches and some of the new smart features on the Fenix 8, like an on-board voice assistant. Otherwise, you\u2019ve got topographical maps, turn-by-turn navigation, and more training metrics than even a seasoned triathlete would know what to do with.<\/p>\n

    The Pro is more size-inclusive than the standard second-gen Epix<\/a>, which only comes in 47mm. You can get the Pro in that size, too, but it also comes in 42mm and 51mm. This was a major complaint I had with the second-gen Epix, and you love to see companies actually take this sort of thing seriously. The best part is the Pro models start at the same price as the regular Epix did. You\u2019ll have to pay $100 extra for materials like titanium and sapphire crystal, but that\u2019s also true of the standard Epix.<\/p>\n

    That said, it muddies the waters if you\u2019re trying to pick between the Epix Pro, Fenix 7<\/a>, Fenix 7 Pro<\/a>, and now, the Fenix 8<\/a>. The main difference is the Epix watches all have OLED displays. One reason I prefer OLED is that they\u2019re much easier to read indoors \u2014 where <\/strong>most of us spend the majority of our time. The Fenix 7 series\u2019 memory-in-pixel displays (plus solar charging if you opt for it) allow for weeks and weeks of charge, but the smallest Epix Pro can get around 10 days with normal usage. The 47mm and 51mm Pro models can go longer between charges due to bigger batteries, but I felt that the 42mm has enough juice to satisfy most use cases. Garmin also has so many battery-saving modes and options that I highly doubt this will ever be an issue.<\/p>\n

    Not helping matters is the fact that the Fenix 8 lets you choose between an OLED or a MIP display. You also get smart features like an onboard voice assistant, the ability to take calls from the wrist, and the Garmin Messenger app. The main problem is the starting price is now $350 more than the standard Fenix 7 and right about on par with the Epix Pro. My personal feeling is the Fenix 8\u2019s smart features are just okay and that you\u2019re really not missing much by not having them. We also often see discounts on older models, so I would put on my bargain-hunting hat for a discounted Epix Pro or Fenix 7 Pro while inventory is still available.<\/p>\n

    But really, the winning feature of the Epix Pro is the hands-free flashlight. It\u2019s so useful in my day-to-day life, and all you have to do is double-press a button. It\u2019s as bright as your smartphone, comes with a red light option if you want something easier on the eyes, and can act as a strobe in an emergency situation. The Fenix 7 Pro and 8 watches also have a flashlight, so a lot of this is going to come down to personal preference for the display, price, and whether you care about smart features.<\/p>\n

    If you\u2019re set on the most battery life possible, I recommend the Fenix 7 Pro over the standard 7 for a few reasons. Its MIP display is slightly brighter, all sizes have the flashlight, and, like the Epix Pro, it has an updated sensor array. I also recommend it over the MIP versions of the Fenix 8 because it comes in more sizes, and<\/em> costs around $300 less. Especially since the Fenix 8\u2019s smart features are a bit half-baked.<\/p>\n

    Read my full Epix Pro review<\/a>.<\/h5>\n

    The best Garmin on a budget<\/h2>\n

    <\/em>Sizes:<\/strong> 40mm w\/ 20mm straps \/ Weight:<\/strong> 19g \/ Battery life:<\/strong> Up to 5 days \/ Display type:<\/strong> \u201cHidden\u201d OLED touchscreen \/ GPS:<\/strong> Tethered GPS \/ Connectivity:<\/strong> Bluetooth, Ant Plus \/ Water resistance:<\/strong> 5ATM \/ Music storage:<\/strong> N\/A<\/em><\/p>\n

    What I love most about the Vivomove Sport is that it doesn\u2019t look like what most people expect from a Garmin. It\u2019s a hybrid smartwatch, which means it looks like a regular watch but can track fitness and deliver notifications. Garmin\u2019s hybrids are also unique in that they all use an OLED display that stays hidden until you need it.<\/p>\n

    This is best suited for a casually active person who wants style and value in a lightweight package. Think wellness, more so than fitness. It gets you continuous heart rate monitoring and blood oxygen level monitoring, and can even provide abnormal heart rate alerts. You also get access to more in-depth metrics like respiration rate, fitness age, stress, and Body Battery, which is Garmin\u2019s tool for visualizing how well-rested you are. For smart features, you get all the basics, like notifications, alarms, and timers.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>\n

    The Sport isn\u2019t quite as full-featured as some other Garmin watches you\u2019ll find on this list. For instance, you\u2019re giving up built-in GPS in favor of tethered GPS through your phone. There are no contactless payments, nor is there a microphone or speaker for taking calls on the wrist. But this is<\/em> a budget pick, and you get a lot, considering this is an entry-level gadget that could pass for a Swatch at a glance.<\/p>\n

    I don\u2019t love that the battery life is short for a hybrid, at around three to four days. Even so, that\u2019s still much better than what you\u2019ll get on an Apple Watch or Wear OS 4 watch. If you\u2019re willing to spend about $100 more, the $269.99 Vivomove Trend<\/a> has more chic materials, gets you more screen real estate, and wireless Qi charging. Otherwise, this is a great lifestyle wearable that can serve as a classier alternative to your typical fitness band.<\/p>\n

    If you prefer something newer to the Sport that\u2019s also stylish, the Garmin Lily 2<\/a> is another good option, especially if you\u2019ve got particularly small wrists or prefer something extremely lightweight. The swipe and tap gestures are still a little fiddly to use \u2014 which was also the case with the first-gen model \u2014 but the fresh design is a fun way to lightly monitor your fitness<\/a> without bogging yourself down with notifications. Garmin also offers the Lily 2 Active<\/a>, which adds a physical button, GPS, and support for more sports tracking for a starting price of $299.99<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Read my full Garmin Vivomove Sport review<\/a>.<\/h5>\n

    The best Garmin to replace a Fitbit<\/h2>\n

    <\/em>Sizes:<\/strong> 40mm w\/ 20mm straps \/ Weight:<\/strong> 38g \/ Battery life:<\/strong> Up to 11 days \/ Display type:<\/strong> OLED touchscreen \/ GPS:<\/strong> All-systems GNSS \/ Connectivity:<\/strong> Bluetooth, Ant Plus \/ Water resistance:<\/strong> 5ATM \/ Music storage:<\/strong> 4GB (for Music Edition)<\/em><\/p>\n

    If you were disappointed by the Fitbit Sense 2<\/a> and Versa 4<\/a>, the Venu Sq 2 is the next best thing (and, in some ways, better).<\/p>\n

    At a glance, the Venu Sq 2 could easily be mistaken for an Apple Watch. On the wrist, you\u2019ll notice it\u2019s made of plastic, but it still looks quite chic and extremely lightweight. The screen is bright, easy to read, and looks better than any Versa or Sense ever did.<\/p>\n

    The feature set is also great for the price, with built-in GPS, a ton of watch faces, emergency safety features, and contactless payments. If you pay $50 more for the Music Edition, you\u2019ll also get about 500 songs worth of storage, but we wouldn\u2019t recommend it. This doesn\u2019t have cellular connectivity and, therefore, isn\u2019t truly standalone. You\u2019ll most likely be carrying your phone with you anyway.<\/p>\n

    \"Garmin<\/p>\n

    As for health features, the Venu Sq 2 basically has everything you\u2019d get on a Versa or Sense smartwatch but with Garmin\u2019s treasure trove of metrics as well. That includes heart rate tracking, blood oxygen tracking, intensity minutes (how much moderate exercise you get in a week), stress tracking, hydration tracking, respiratory rate, period tracking, and Garmin\u2019s recovery feature, Body Battery. As far as fitness goes, you also get access to Garmin Coach, which provides free 5K, 10K, and half marathon training plans. You love to see it.<\/p>\n

    Another big leg-up Garmin has over Fitbit? None of these features or metrics are locked behind a paywall, even if Garmin\u2019s AI-powered insights and a few other expanded features will only be available as part of Garmin Connect Plus ($6.99 a month \/ $69.99 annually).<\/p>\n

    Read my full Garmin Venu Sq 2 review<\/a>.<\/h5>\n

    The best Garmin smartwatch<\/h2>\n

    <\/em>Sizes:<\/strong> 41mm w\/ 18mm straps; 45mm w\/ 22mm straps \/ Weight:<\/strong> 40g for the 3S; 47g for the 3 \/ Battery life:<\/strong> Up to 10 days for 3S; 14 days for 3 \/ Display type:<\/strong> OLED touchscreen \/ GPS:<\/strong> GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO \/ Connectivity:<\/strong> Bluetooth, Ant Plus, Wi-Fi \/ Water resistance:<\/strong> 5ATM \/ Music storage:<\/strong> 8GB<\/em><\/p>\n

    Garmin has shored up the smarts in its watches over the past several years, and the Venu 3 series is the smartest (and most affordable) of the bunch.<\/p>\n

    The Venu 3 series comes in two sizes: 41mm and 45mm. Like the Venu 2 Plus<\/a>, it has a microphone and speaker. <\/strong>You can take calls directly from the wrist and issue commands to your phone\u2019s digital assistant via Bluetooth. It\u2019s not the same as having Siri, Bixby, Amazon Alexa, or Google Assistant built directly into the watch, but it\u2019s a clever workaround that works well for hands-free control. It also supports safety features like fall detection and live tracking, as well as contactless payments.<\/p>\n

    \"Person<\/p>\n

    Like other OLED Garmins, the display is both vibrant and easy to read. As for health and fitness, you get a nice mix of basic and more advanced features and metrics. It has Garmin\u2019s latest heart rate sensor, which enables FDA-cleared EKG and AFib detection features. Overall, it leans a bit more on the wellness and health side of things, with intensity minutes, blood oxygen monitoring, sleep tracking, period tracking, abnormal heart rate alerts, and stress tracking. As for training, you still get built-in GPS, VO2 Max, heart rate zones, respiration rate, and downloadable training plans via Garmin Coach.<\/p>\n

    New to the 3 and 3S is a sleep coach that factors in metrics like heart rate variability and recent activity to determine your sleep needs. It also finally adds nap detection, a feature that\u2019s been long overdue for the Garmin platform. The Venu 3 series also adds audio-guided meditation sessions, and you can view how these sessions directly impact your metrics. From an accessibility standpoint, this also adds a new wheelchair mode.<\/p>\n

    Technically, the new Fenix 8 is slightly smarter in that it adds an on-board voice assistant. However, it is also more than double the price and not what I\u2019d consider a good value for the average athlete. It\u2019s more for people who spend hours upon hours training every week.<\/p>\n

    This is the Garmin for you if you want the platform\u2019s in-depth training without sacrificing the productivity of a smartwatch. The main things it\u2019s lacking are cellular options and a robust third-party app ecosystem. That said, it\u2019s got Spotify, Amazon Music, and Deezer for offline listening. It\u2019s also a good option if you\u2019re fed up with MIP displays and want a smarter<\/em> Garmin rather than a full-on smartwatch.<\/p>\n

    Read my full Garmin Venu 3S review<\/strong><\/a>.<\/h5>\n

    What\u2019s coming next<\/h2>\n